Welcome to the Adviser Education Hub
This Hub has been designed for investment professionals only.
To get started, please confirm that you are an investment professional.
Disclaimer
By clicking below, you confirm that you are an investment professional authorised by the FCA. Once you confirm, you will be able to access the Hub. If you do not meet these criteria, please return to our main website.
Post learning assessment
Test your knowledge by taking our assessment below. Then claim your CPD certificate.
Claim your CPD Certificate
Complete the form below to secure your Continuing Professional Development (CPD) certificate.
Claim your CPD Certificate
Complete the form below to secure your Continuing Professional Development (CPD) certificate.
Claim your CPD Certificate
Complete the form below to secure your Continuing Professional Development (CPD) certificate.
Gifting of assets and failed Potentially Exempt Transfers (PETs)
Understand how careful timing of lifetime gifts is required to ensure all relevant tax implications are considered.
Terminology explained
Potentially Exempt Transfers (PETs)
A Potentially Exempt Transfer allows for unlimited value gifts that become exempt from IHT if the donor survives for seven years after the gift. If the donor does not survive this period, the gift reduces the donor's available NRB.
'Clawback'
Clawback refers to the process by which the tax authorities reclaim Inheritance Tax (IHT) benefits previously granted on gifts or transfers if certain conditions are not met. For example, if a Potentially Exempt Transfer (PET) is made, but the donor does not survive for the required seven years, IHT benefits initially anticipated for that gift can be "clawed back" and become subject to taxation. This mechanism ensures that the tax advantages of certain estate planning strategies are only realised if all statutory conditions are fully satisfied over the specified time frames.
Scenario background
David and Simon are civil partners.
They each own £200k of assets which potentially qualify for Business Relief (BR).
Simon acquired his BR assets two years ago, whilst David acquired his BR assets a year later.
They have now decided that they no longer need the BR assets, and so intend to gift their BR assets to their two children.
They are not concerned about the BR status of the gift as they are both in good health, and expect to comfortably survive seven years from the date of making the gift.
David and Simon died just months after gifting the BR assets to their children.
Scenario 1
- David had held the BR assets for just 1 year before gifting them to his children.
Scenario 2
- Simon had held the BR assets for over two years at the time of gifting them to his children.
Take away
Simon and David gifted BR assets after having held them for just one and two years respectively.
If these BR assets were qualifying EIS or SEIS investments, the gift may have triggered the ‘clawback’ of any income tax relief received on the investment, and potentially be liable to Capital Gains Tax (CGT). Had they retained ownership, any “clawback” may not have arisen and would not have prejudiced the treatment upon death.
Careful timing of lifetime gifts is therefore required to ensure all relevant tax implications are considered.
---------------
Opinions expressed represent the views of the author at the time of publication, are subject to change, and should not be interpreted as investment or tax advice.
Important notice: This article is for investment professionals only. This article is for information only and does not form part of a direct offer or invitation to purchase, subscribe for or dispose of securities and no reliance should be placed on it. No reliance should be made on this content to inform any investment of tax planning decision.
This content contains information that is believed to be accurate at the time of publication but is subject to change without notice. The explanation of all of the tax rules set out have been written in accordance with our understanding of the law and interpretation of it at the time of publication.
Whilst care has been taken in compiling this content, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made by Downing LLP as to its accuracy or completeness, including for external sources (which may have been used) which have not been verified.
Claim your CPD Certificate
Complete the form below to secure your Continuing Professional Development (CPD) certificate.
Gifting of assets and failed Potentially Exempt Transfers (PETs)
Understand how careful timing of lifetime gifts is required to ensure all relevant tax implications are considered.
Terminology explained
Potentially Exempt Transfers (PETs)
A Potentially Exempt Transfer allows for unlimited value gifts that become exempt from IHT if the donor survives for seven years after the gift. If the donor does not survive this period, the gift reduces the donor's available NRB.
'Clawback'
Clawback refers to the process by which the tax authorities reclaim Inheritance Tax (IHT) benefits previously granted on gifts or transfers if certain conditions are not met. For example, if a Potentially Exempt Transfer (PET) is made, but the donor does not survive for the required seven years, IHT benefits initially anticipated for that gift can be "clawed back" and become subject to taxation. This mechanism ensures that the tax advantages of certain estate planning strategies are only realised if all statutory conditions are fully satisfied over the specified time frames.
Scenario background
David and Simon are civil partners.
They each own £200k of assets which potentially qualify for Business Relief (BR).
Simon acquired his BR assets two years ago, whilst David acquired his BR assets a year later.
They have now decided that they no longer need the BR assets, and so intend to gift their BR assets to their two children.
They are not concerned about the BR status of the gift as they are both in good health, and expect to comfortably survive seven years from the date of making the gift.
David and Simon died just months after gifting the BR assets to their children.
Scenario 1
- David had held the BR assets for just 1 year before gifting them to his children.
Scenario 2
- Simon had held the BR assets for over two years at the time of gifting them to his children.
Take away
Simon and David gifted BR assets after having held them for just one and two years respectively.
If these BR assets were qualifying EIS or SEIS investments, the gift may have triggered the ‘clawback’ of any income tax relief received on the investment, and potentially be liable to Capital Gains Tax (CGT). Had they retained ownership, any “clawback” may not have arisen and would not have prejudiced the treatment upon death.
Careful timing of lifetime gifts is therefore required to ensure all relevant tax implications are considered.
---------------
Opinions expressed represent the views of the author at the time of publication, are subject to change, and should not be interpreted as investment or tax advice.
Important notice: This article is for investment professionals only. This article is for information only and does not form part of a direct offer or invitation to purchase, subscribe for or dispose of securities and no reliance should be placed on it. No reliance should be made on this content to inform any investment of tax planning decision.
This content contains information that is believed to be accurate at the time of publication but is subject to change without notice. The explanation of all of the tax rules set out have been written in accordance with our understanding of the law and interpretation of it at the time of publication.
Whilst care has been taken in compiling this content, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made by Downing LLP as to its accuracy or completeness, including for external sources (which may have been used) which have not been verified.
Claim your CPD Certificate
Complete the form below to secure your Continuing Professional Development (CPD) certificate.
Claim your CPD Certificate
Complete the form below to secure your Continuing Professional Development (CPD) certificate.
Claim your CPD Certificate
Complete the form below to secure your Continuing Professional Development (CPD) certificate.
Claim your CPD Certificate
Complete the form below to secure your Continuing Professional Development (CPD) certificate.
Terminology explained
Potentially Exempt Transfers (PETs)
A Potentially Exempt Transfer allows for unlimited value gifts that become exempt from IHT if the donor survives for seven years after the gift. If the donor does not survive this period, the gift reduces the donor's available NRB.
'Clawback'
Clawback refers to the process by which the tax authorities reclaim Inheritance Tax (IHT) benefits previously granted on gifts or transfers if certain conditions are not met. For example, if a Potentially Exempt Transfer (PET) is made, but the donor does not survive for the required seven years, IHT benefits initially anticipated for that gift can be "clawed back" and become subject to taxation. This mechanism ensures that the tax advantages of certain estate planning strategies are only realised if all statutory conditions are fully satisfied over the specified time frames.
Scenario background
David and Simon are civil partners.
They each own £200k of assets which potentially qualify for Business Relief (BR).
Simon acquired his BR assets two years ago, whilst David acquired his BR assets a year later.
They have now decided that they no longer need the BR assets, and so intend to gift their BR assets to their two children.
They are not concerned about the BR status of the gift as they are both in good health, and expect to comfortably survive seven years from the date of making the gift.
David and Simon died just months after gifting the BR assets to their children.
Scenario 1
- David had held the BR assets for just 1 year before gifting them to his children.
Scenario 2
- Simon had held the BR assets for over two years at the time of gifting them to his children.
Take away
Simon and David gifted BR assets after having held them for just one and two years respectively.
If these BR assets were qualifying EIS or SEIS investments, the gift may have triggered the ‘clawback’ of any income tax relief received on the investment, and potentially be liable to Capital Gains Tax (CGT). Had they retained ownership, any “clawback” may not have arisen and would not have prejudiced the treatment upon death.
Careful timing of lifetime gifts is therefore required to ensure all relevant tax implications are considered.
---------------
Opinions expressed represent the views of the author at the time of publication, are subject to change, and should not be interpreted as investment or tax advice.
Important notice: This article is for investment professionals only. This article is for information only and does not form part of a direct offer or invitation to purchase, subscribe for or dispose of securities and no reliance should be placed on it. No reliance should be made on this content to inform any investment of tax planning decision.
This content contains information that is believed to be accurate at the time of publication but is subject to change without notice. The explanation of all of the tax rules set out have been written in accordance with our understanding of the law and interpretation of it at the time of publication.
Whilst care has been taken in compiling this content, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made by Downing LLP as to its accuracy or completeness, including for external sources (which may have been used) which have not been verified.
Claim your CPD Certificate
Complete the form below to secure your Continuing Professional Development (CPD) certificate.
Terminology explained
Potentially Exempt Transfers (PETs)
A Potentially Exempt Transfer allows for unlimited value gifts that become exempt from IHT if the donor survives for seven years after the gift. If the donor does not survive this period, the gift reduces the donor's available NRB.
'Clawback'
Clawback refers to the process by which the tax authorities reclaim Inheritance Tax (IHT) benefits previously granted on gifts or transfers if certain conditions are not met. For example, if a Potentially Exempt Transfer (PET) is made, but the donor does not survive for the required seven years, IHT benefits initially anticipated for that gift can be "clawed back" and become subject to taxation. This mechanism ensures that the tax advantages of certain estate planning strategies are only realised if all statutory conditions are fully satisfied over the specified time frames.
Scenario background
David and Simon are civil partners.
They each own £200k of assets which potentially qualify for Business Relief (BR).
Simon acquired his BR assets two years ago, whilst David acquired his BR assets a year later.
They have now decided that they no longer need the BR assets, and so intend to gift their BR assets to their two children.
They are not concerned about the BR status of the gift as they are both in good health, and expect to comfortably survive seven years from the date of making the gift.
David and Simon died just months after gifting the BR assets to their children.
Scenario 1
- David had held the BR assets for just 1 year before gifting them to his children.
Scenario 2
- Simon had held the BR assets for over two years at the time of gifting them to his children.
Take away
Simon and David gifted BR assets after having held them for just one and two years respectively.
If these BR assets were qualifying EIS or SEIS investments, the gift may have triggered the ‘clawback’ of any income tax relief received on the investment, and potentially be liable to Capital Gains Tax (CGT). Had they retained ownership, any “clawback” may not have arisen and would not have prejudiced the treatment upon death.
Careful timing of lifetime gifts is therefore required to ensure all relevant tax implications are considered.
---------------
Opinions expressed represent the views of the author at the time of publication, are subject to change, and should not be interpreted as investment or tax advice.
Important notice: This article is for investment professionals only. This article is for information only and does not form part of a direct offer or invitation to purchase, subscribe for or dispose of securities and no reliance should be placed on it. No reliance should be made on this content to inform any investment of tax planning decision.
This content contains information that is believed to be accurate at the time of publication but is subject to change without notice. The explanation of all of the tax rules set out have been written in accordance with our understanding of the law and interpretation of it at the time of publication.
Whilst care has been taken in compiling this content, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made by Downing LLP as to its accuracy or completeness, including for external sources (which may have been used) which have not been verified.
Claim your CPD Certificate
Complete the form below to secure your Continuing Professional Development (CPD) certificate.
Speak to an expert
Complete the form below and one of our experts will contact you shortly to learn more about your specific requirements.